I recently created a custom post type [CPT] with an associated custom taxonomy on this blog to better manage my portfolio, and I thought I would share one little hoop I had to jump through to enable manual sorting of the post-type taxonomy archives.(read more )
2014 Logo Trends[/caption]Bill Gardner at The Logo Lounge has compiled his 2014 Logo Trends, a look at what’s popular in logo design. The narrative emphasizes the steadily increasing importance of Smart Phones to the design worlds, as logos lose some detail so they can be attractively rendered on small screens.
Note: If you’ve come to realize that your website IS your business and most people look at it on a smart phone, you might lose all interest in seeing your logo on a glossy print brochure.
Making forms that look good and work well is hard. At Sitepoint, Jessica Enders has made it a little easier with “The Definitive Guide To Form Label Positioning“, which I would have called something like “A Look At Form Label Positioning” because I tend to hedge, but it’s certainly a guide and if not definitive it’s danged helpful.
Ms. Enders lists the Pros and Cons of 5 placement options (label on top of the field, to the left of the field and flush left, to the left of the field and flush right, inside the field, as a tool tip), dismisses the last two as a bad idea and provides some questions you can ask yourself in deciding among the others (“Will this form be filled out on small screens?”, for instance).
But making forms that look good and work well is still hard.
This post explains a tiny boost Internet Explorer needs to render the HTML5 element “<main>” the same way the rest of the modern world does. It came up for me using IE 11-64 bit, but may pertain elsewhere.
(read more )
Some sites that I work on get more than half their traffic from mobile devices (tech-speak for “smart phones”). Not all of them — some businesses appeal more to a demographic of people looking at a big screen on a desk — but many, and the number will do nothing but increase. For while we’ve known that the mobile era is coming. Now it’s arrived. (To be accurate, it arrived a while back when I was paying attention to other things, but now I’ve noticed it.)
The mobile era won’t change the fact that some 95% of web interactions begin with search and the importance of search presence (SEO, SEM, etc.) won’t diminish along with the use of big screens, so, as we choose strategies for adapting our site designs for different screen sizes we need to check in to see how those strategies will effect our search rankings.
In this article, Google settles the question:
We recommend using responsive web design because it has many good aspects:
- Using a single URL for a piece of content makes it easier for your users to interact with, share, and link to your content, and a single URL for the content helps Google’s algorithms assign the indexing properties for the content.
- No redirection is needed for users to get to the device-optimized view, which reduces loading time. Also, user agent-based redirection is error-prone and can degrade your site’s user experience (see “Pitfalls when detecting user agents” section for details).
- It saves resources for both your site and Google’s crawlers. For responsive web design pages, any Googlebot user agents needs to crawl your pages once, as opposed to crawling multiple times with different user agents, to retrieve your content. This improvement in crawling efficiency can indirectly help Google index more of the site’s contents and keep it appropriately fresh.
So, that’s one thing we don’t need to think about anymore.